Ancient Medicine

Roman Army Surgeons and Military Hospitals

The medical care given to Roman soldiers: field treatment, army medici and surgeons, fort hospitals called valetudinaria, instruments, and what evidence survives.

On this page
  1. Why the army needed medicine
  2. Who treated the soldiers
  3. Treatment on campaign
  4. The valetudinarium
  5. Hygiene and camp life
  6. Care, discharge and status
  7. What this adds to the history of medicine

Why the army needed medicine

A Roman soldier was an expensive investment, trained over years and expected to serve for a long period. Keeping soldiers fit was therefore a practical matter as well as a humanitarian one. Armies faced wounds from combat, accidents in training and construction, and the infections that spread in camps and on campaign. As Roman expansion carried the army across the Mediterranean world and beyond, it developed medical arrangements that were, for their time, unusually organised, though the surviving evidence is patchy and much remains uncertain.

Who treated the soldiers

Inscriptions and a few written sources name medical personnel attached to military units. The terms used vary. A common one is medicus, which simply means a doctor, and holders of the title appear in units ranging from the auxiliary cohorts to the Roman legions and the fleets. Some were classed as ordinary soldiers with a specialised duty, which exempted them from some other tasks, while others seem to have held higher ranks. A number of the known medici have Greek names, which fits a wider pattern in which Greek-trained physicians worked in the Roman world.

Evidence is clearer for the existence of these doctors than for their training. Some probably learned through apprenticeship, others perhaps in civilian practice before enlisting. There was no standard qualification, so skill must have varied.

Lower-level medical staff also appear. Orderlies and attendants, sometimes with titles such as capsarii, are associated with carrying bandages and giving first aid in the field. Their exact duties and the date at which the term became common are debated, so these descriptions should be treated as probable and not fixed.

Treatment on campaign

On campaign, where soldiers built nightly shelters in Roman marching camps, treatment was mostly first aid and field surgery. Typical injuries came from swords, spears, arrows, sling shot and falls. Treatment would include stopping bleeding, cleaning and dressing wounds, removing missile heads, setting fractures and, when needed, amputation. Surgical writers of the period, such as Celsus in his medical handbook, describe techniques for removing arrowheads and handling wounds, and these methods are likely to be close to what military doctors practised.

Medical instruments found at military sites support this picture. Forceps, scalpels, probes, spatulas and hooks of bronze and iron appear in finds from forts and from graves associated with doctors. Because such tools were also used by civilian doctors, an instrument set alone does not prove a military connection, but the context often helps.

Dressings, wine, vinegar, honey and plant-based remedies would have formed part of the supply, in line with the broader drug lore of the time. The herbs used for wounds are documented in works such as that of Dioscorides, who is generally thought to have been connected with the army.

The valetudinarium

In permanent forts, there is evidence for dedicated hospital buildings, called valetudinaria. Archaeologists have identified buildings in a number of legionary fortresses, mostly on the northern frontiers, with a typical layout of rooms opening off a central courtyard or corridor. The rooms may have been small wards, and some buildings included a larger hall and service rooms. Fortresses where such buildings have been proposed include sites in Britain and along the Rhine and Danube.

There is, however, a caution. Identification of a building as a hospital rests largely on its plan and position, since few finds are conclusive. Some scholars have suggested alternative uses for certain structures, and the question is debated. A fair statement is that legionary fortresses probably had provision for the sick, even if the exact form is not always clear. Smaller forts, especially those of auxiliary units, are less likely to have had full hospital buildings.

Written sources also mention care of the sick and wounded in more general terms. A text on camp layout attributed to Hyginus, and later writings on military organisation, refer to areas for the sick, though these sources are difficult to date and should be read cautiously.

Hygiene and camp life

Roman military planning included features that would have helped health. Camps were laid out on a regular plan, with drains and latrines, and forts often had bath buildings, a military version of the habit shown by the Roman public baths in cities. Water supply was a concern and, near permanent bases, could involve piped systems like those described under Roman aqueducts. Whether these measures deliberately aimed at health, or simply at order and comfort, is not always clear. Soldiers still fell ill from dysentery, fevers and other diseases, as armies of every era did, and, as in most pre-modern armies, disease probably caused many deaths, though precise figures are not available for the Roman case.

Diet was also part of army life, with grain forming the staple of the ration, as it did in the wider Roman diet. The army’s supply system was a major operation in its own right.

Care, discharge and status

Soldiers who were permanently disabled by wounds could be discharged, and some may have received privileges. Evidence for the details is limited. Records of the army’s treatment of its sick come from tombstones, military diplomas and incidental references, so the picture is a patchwork. In the Roman world more generally, there were also physicians in cities, and some may have been called on by the army.

What this adds to the history of medicine

The army’s medical system shows that Roman medicine was not only the preserve of philosophers and wealthy patients. It had a practical and institutional side, with trained staff, supplies and buildings meant to serve a large population of men in a particular setting. We should not exaggerate its effectiveness. Without knowledge of germs or reliable anaesthesia, outcomes were often poor, and many wounds led to infection. Still, the combination of organisation, experience with trauma and surgical skill makes the Roman military one of the best-documented medical settings of the ancient world.

The complete guide to ancient medicine

Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →